![]() If we want companies to produce a high standard in software we need to live with the idea that that software will cost money. They’re clearly going for a dumping price strategy here, and I can’t think this might be doing much good to the market.ĭeveloping software costs money, time and resources. ![]() On the other hand, apple is perhaps not doing us such a big favour on the long run. I might even buy it, though I really have no need for it. Hell you could even just buy it to see if it’s worth it. Well there’s certainly not much to loose on a 30$ download. I wish Apple had bought Adobe back in the day or had a product that competes with Photoshop because 1) Photoshop would be way cheaper and 2) it wouldn’t be like MS Office with new versions every two years with pointless UI tweaks. The problem is there isn’t always that much to innovate so they just end up switching around the interface which just wastes everyone’s time relearning it. Sounds good in theory right, they always have to be innovating. Adobe CS is basically they’re only income stream so if they want to meet quarterly earnings they have to have a new version in the works constantly. They can let the Logic team do their own thing for as long as it takes to produce something awesome. Apple has tons of money coming in from all over the place. ![]() They don’t need to rush things out just to turn a profit for the year. How can take something seriously that seems to come out with new versions constantly making you waste time upgrading and testing and relearning? This is why I’d rather use a DAW by a company who has other revenue streams besides music software. I think people are just so stuck on the upgrade treadmill that if their DAW doesn’t come out with an update every 16 months they assume it must be discontinued! Too me the slow updates are what signifies a “pro” app.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |